Talk:Open closed principle
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Is that a direct quote? put it in under the first paragraph. Don't forget to reference-[[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 08:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | Is that a direct quote? put it in under the first paragraph. Don't forget to reference-[[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 08:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Negatory, it is not a direct quote. --[[User:Elliot Fisher|Elliot Fisher]] 07:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Negatory? Have you been watching [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_Girl_(film) Tank Girl] again? -- [[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 12:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:29, 20 September 2008
little definition of the Open closed principle --Dom 05:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I found the clearest explanation for me in the paper itself was something like: to leave a module open for extension but closed for modification, it should be possible to add new functionality by adding new code, but never having to modify existing code. This is achieved by adding new derived classes. --Elliot Fisher 08:26, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
Is that a direct quote? put it in under the first paragraph. Don't forget to reference-Jason Clutterbuck 08:35, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Negatory, it is not a direct quote. --Elliot Fisher 07:08, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Negatory? Have you been watching Tank Girl again? -- Jason Clutterbuck 12:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
