Talk:Many to many association idiom
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Started the page. Put up some pretty pictures. If they can be improved tell me i can edit them easily --[[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | Started the page. Put up some pretty pictures. If they can be improved tell me i can edit them easily --[[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if Transaction was renamed Rental. --[[User:Warwick Irwin|Wal]] 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | + | :I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if Transaction was renamed Rental. --[[User:Warwick Irwin|Wal]] 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:01, 22 July 2008
Started the page. Put up some pretty pictures. If they can be improved tell me i can edit them easily --Jason Clutterbuck 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if Transaction was renamed Rental. --Wal 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
