2010 frog design criticisms
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Colin Fagg (Talk | contribs) (New page: 1. Becomes Issue(Egg-Tad-Frog) 2. Tadpole Tailtype. (Switch stament smell. Change to strategy pattern) 3. Move Interdace should be Method 4. saute in wine, export to xml {frog knows about ...) |
Colin Fagg (Talk | contribs) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. Becomes Issue(Egg-Tad-Frog) | 1. Becomes Issue(Egg-Tad-Frog) | ||
− | 2. Tadpole Tailtype. (Switch stament smell. Change to strategy pattern) | + | |
+ | 2. Tadpole Tailtype i.e. Swim method. (Switch stament smell. Type Safety issues. Maybe Change to strategy pattern) | ||
+ | |||
3. Move Interdace should be Method | 3. Move Interdace should be Method | ||
− | 4. saute in wine, export to xml {frog knows about this?} | + | |
+ | 4. saute in wine, export to xml {frog knows about this? i.e. seperation of concerns, model the real world.} | ||
+ | |||
5. singleton biologist broken. | 5. singleton biologist broken. | ||
+ | |||
6. Frogbrain? (why doe it have eggs) | 6. Frogbrain? (why doe it have eggs) | ||
+ | |||
7. Adult frog knows who ate it. | 7. Adult frog knows who ate it. | ||
− | 8. Toad is a subclass of Frog | + | |
− | 9. | + | 8. Toad is a subclass of Frog. (Inheritance for implementation) |
+ | |||
+ | 9. Encapsulation Violation | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10. |
Latest revision as of 05:00, 15 July 2010
1. Becomes Issue(Egg-Tad-Frog)
2. Tadpole Tailtype i.e. Swim method. (Switch stament smell. Type Safety issues. Maybe Change to strategy pattern)
3. Move Interdace should be Method
4. saute in wine, export to xml {frog knows about this? i.e. seperation of concerns, model the real world.}
5. singleton biologist broken.
6. Frogbrain? (why doe it have eggs)
7. Adult frog knows who ate it.
8. Toad is a subclass of Frog. (Inheritance for implementation)
9. Encapsulation Violation
10.