Talk:OO wisdom
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (Reverted edits by Ebybymic (Talk); changed back to last version by Matthew Harward) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:22, 25 November 2010
I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- User:Michal Connole
- I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --Matthew Harward 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under OO culture as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --Michal Connole 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --Matthew Harward 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
