Long method smell
m (Reverted edits by Ebybymic (Talk); changed back to last version by Matthew Harward) |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | "Object programs live best and longest with short methods. The payoffs of indirection - explanation, sharing and choosing - are supported by little methods. Everybody knows short is good." [1] | + | "Object programs live best and longest with short methods. The payoffs of indirection - explanation, sharing and choosing - are supported by little methods. Everybody knows short is good." [http://sis36.berkeley.edu/projects/streek/agile/bad-smells-in-code.html#Long+Method (1)] |
| − | The Long method code smell is a sign that you possibly need to take some part of related functionality in your method and create a new method to hold this functionality. This action is known as | + | The Long method code smell is a sign that you possibly need to take some part of related functionality in your method and create a new method to hold this functionality. This action is known as [[Extract Method]] |
| − | Comments in your method are sometimes a good sign that you need to extract the block of code that has been commented into a new method whose name describes the functionality that the comment was originally describing. Even if a single line of code requires explanation then it is probably worth extracting it into a new method. [1] | + | Comments in your method are sometimes a good sign that you need to extract the block of code that has been commented into a new method whose name describes the functionality that the comment was originally describing. Even if a single line of code requires explanation then it is probably worth extracting it into a new method. [http://sis36.berkeley.edu/projects/streek/agile/bad-smells-in-code.html#Long+Method (1)] |
== References == | == References == | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. [http://sis36.berkeley.edu/projects/streek/agile/bad-smells-in-code.html#Long+Method Bad Smells in Code - A Summary of Martin Fowler's Code Smell Chapter in "Refactoring"] |
| + | ==External Links== | ||
| + | [http://www.refactoring.com/catalog/extractMethod.html Extract Method] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == See also == | ||
| + | * [[Code smells]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{Template:CodeSmells}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Code smells]] | ||
Latest revision as of 03:18, 25 November 2010
"Object programs live best and longest with short methods. The payoffs of indirection - explanation, sharing and choosing - are supported by little methods. Everybody knows short is good." (1)
The Long method code smell is a sign that you possibly need to take some part of related functionality in your method and create a new method to hold this functionality. This action is known as Extract Method
Comments in your method are sometimes a good sign that you need to extract the block of code that has been commented into a new method whose name describes the functionality that the comment was originally describing. Even if a single line of code requires explanation then it is probably worth extracting it into a new method. (1)
References
1. Bad Smells in Code - A Summary of Martin Fowler's Code Smell Chapter in "Refactoring"
External Links
See also
