Talk:OO wisdom

From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Ebybymic (Talk); changed back to last version by Matthew Harward)
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
>I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- [[User:Michal Connole]]
+
I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- [[User:Michal Connole]]
:I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
+
:I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
  
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
+
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 
:I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 
:I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
 
----
 
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 
----
 
=[http://ototeji.co.cc UNDER COSTRUCTION, PLEASE SEE THIS POST IN RESERVE COPY]=
 
----
 
=[http://ototeji.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 
----
 
</div>
 

Latest revision as of 03:22, 25 November 2010

I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- User:Michal Connole

I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --Matthew Harward 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under OO culture as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --Michal Connole 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I thought that idioms were just language specific design 'features', for want of a better description. In which case then surely they belong with the Normal OOD stuff... --Matthew Harward 08:40, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools