Talk:Command
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: I am wondering if this pattern includes also a Strategy pattern for the modeling of the Command objects, since each command object pretty much is just a different implementation of the...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I am wondering if this pattern includes also a [[Strategy]] pattern for the modeling of the Command objects, since each command object pretty much is just a different implementation of the execute()-method?--[[User:Dominic Winkler|Dom]] 03:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | I am wondering if this pattern includes also a [[Strategy]] pattern for the modeling of the Command objects, since each command object pretty much is just a different implementation of the execute()-method?--[[User:Dominic Winkler|Dom]] 03:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey Dom, I was just reading the usage part where it says: "Sometimes you need to issue a request to an object without even knowing anything about the requested operation or the receiving object itself." I think this is how it differs from the [[Strategy]] pattern, because the strategy context/client knows what each method should do. --[[User:Elliot Fisher|Elliot Fisher]] 03:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:52, 4 October 2008
I am wondering if this pattern includes also a Strategy pattern for the modeling of the Command objects, since each command object pretty much is just a different implementation of the execute()-method?--Dom 03:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Hey Dom, I was just reading the usage part where it says: "Sometimes you need to issue a request to an object without even knowing anything about the requested operation or the receiving object itself." I think this is how it differs from the Strategy pattern, because the strategy context/client knows what each method should do. --Elliot Fisher 03:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
