Talk:OO wisdom
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- [[User:Michal Connole]] | I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- [[User:Michal Connole]] | ||
:I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | :I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under [[OO culture]] as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:01, 24 July 2009
I think some of these links should be on the main page rather than here. For example, I don't really think OO Gurus fits under the heading of OO wisdom -- User:Michal Connole
- I would agree with that, maybe the main page needs a section named something like "Content" which would contain resources, OO wisdom, OO culture and possibly a section for the understanding/restructuring of OO wisdom. --Matthew Harward 09:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
It would make sense to me for idioms to be listed under OO culture as idioms are really a cultural thing rather than "wisdom". Thoughts? --Michal Connole 10:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)