Talk:Main Page
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The most common page people access from this page is [[OO wisdom]], is it worth making it bold of something so it stands out? --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | The most common page people access from this page is [[OO wisdom]], is it worth making it bold of something so it stands out? --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 08:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | I'm not sure making it bold is the best idea. I think the OO wisdom page should actually be split up for nicer organisation of the wiki in general. At the moment we seem to have a lot of long lists of pages that aren't nicely categorised. --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 09:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC) | + | :I'm not sure making it bold is the best idea. I think the OO wisdom page should actually be split up for nicer organisation of the wiki in general. At the moment we seem to have a lot of long lists of pages that aren't nicely categorised. --[[User:Michal Connole|Michal Connole]] 09:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC) |
+ | |||
+ | :I have made a section for 'contents' this page. It should help regular users from scanning unnecessary content in the page. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 20:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:52, 28 July 2009
Wal was here.
Look guys we're on Google but check out the link the have found. Hit number five. Random Aye? -Jason Clutterbuck 09:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
The most common page people access from this page is OO wisdom, is it worth making it bold of something so it stands out? --Matthew Harward 08:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure making it bold is the best idea. I think the OO wisdom page should actually be split up for nicer organisation of the wiki in general. At the moment we seem to have a lot of long lists of pages that aren't nicely categorised. --Michal Connole 09:58, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have made a section for 'contents' this page. It should help regular users from scanning unnecessary content in the page. --Matthew Harward 20:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)