Matthew's Design Study

From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
===Design Discussion/Overview===
 
===Design Discussion/Overview===
In this section I will briefly discuss each of the current components and their roles. Please note that these functional groupings do not directly correspond to existing packages.
+
In this section I will briefly discuss each of the current components and their roles. Please note that these functional groupings do not directly correspond to existing packages. The diagrams to the left provide further detail.
 
* '''Plugin:''' This [[Singleton]] class provides a launcher for the Eclipse plugin. It provides all of the initial driving calls to instantiate the underlying document monitor and listeners.
 
* '''Plugin:''' This [[Singleton]] class provides a launcher for the Eclipse plugin. It provides all of the initial driving calls to instantiate the underlying document monitor and listeners.
 
* '''Document Monitor:''' This package provides handling of Java files in the editor, keeping track of those that have been loaded and also as a location to retrieve updated metrics data. Generally, this class relies on [[Singleton]]s to keep track of the open files.
 
* '''Document Monitor:''' This package provides handling of Java files in the editor, keeping track of those that have been loaded and also as a location to retrieve updated metrics data. Generally, this class relies on [[Singleton]]s to keep track of the open files.
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
===Existing Usage of OOD Features & Techniques===
 
===Existing Usage of OOD Features & Techniques===
 +
* [[Design patterns]] currently used:
 +
** [[Observer]] is used in the API.
 +
** [[Singleton]] is used widely in both the Editor Listeners and the Document Monitor groupings.
 +
** [[Strategy]] is used with the Display and DisplayStrategy.
 +
** [[Command]] MetricFile acts like a passable object to facilitate interactions.
 +
** [[Template Method]] is used in Range and Display Strategy.
 +
** [[Factory Method]] is used in the API and with the Display.
 +
* Design Maxims/Idioms followed (imo):
 +
** [[Model the real world]] the classes represent solid concepts.
 +
** [[Favor composition over inheritance]] composition is used in favor of inheritance where possible.
 +
** [[Once and only once]] repeated code is minimal, even in the similar DisplayStrategy classes.
 +
** ...
 +
* Design Maixim/Idioms neglected:
 +
** [[Behavioral completeness]] vs [[You ain't gonna need it]] neither of these principles have been explicitly followed.
 +
** [[Extensibility]] has not been considered to a sufficient degree.
 +
** [[Encapsulate that which varies]] has been broken as Strings are used to convey data in certain parts of the system.
  
 
===Areas of Greatest Concern===
 
===Areas of Greatest Concern===

Revision as of 04:33, 28 July 2009

For my design study, I am going to be working to improve the design of my COSC460 project. The project is a plug-in for Eclipse designed to provide a tool for visualising software metrics directly onto source code. The plug-in is written in Java and is approximately 5K LOC.

Contents

Existing Code Base

This system is my first attempt at developing this system. At first glance it appears fairly logical; however, some more serious OOD issues lurk beneath the surface...

Initial development. Please note some of the composition/dependency connections are wrong.
Initial development with functional groupings.

Design Discussion/Overview

In this section I will briefly discuss each of the current components and their roles. Please note that these functional groupings do not directly correspond to existing packages. The diagrams to the left provide further detail.

  • Plugin: This Singleton class provides a launcher for the Eclipse plugin. It provides all of the initial driving calls to instantiate the underlying document monitor and listeners.
  • Document Monitor: This package provides handling of Java files in the editor, keeping track of those that have been loaded and also as a location to retrieve updated metrics data. Generally, this class relies on Singletons to keep track of the open files.
  • Editor Listeners: These classes listen to the Eclipse editor, in most cases this is effectively the current document's buffer. Each change of state is reported to the EditorListener class.
  • The Model: This set of packages provides a representation of the stored data. A MetricDocument contains all of the metrics, mappings and displays for a single Java file. There can be multiple

metrics represented using multiple mappings in any one document, and each of these may have multiple MetricSections, which represent the an actual appearance of the metric in the editor.

  • Display & Editor Manipulation: This set of classes deal with the current Eclipse editor and provide the functionality to add adornments to the editor. A wide variety of these adornments exist,

they are backed up with appropriate Shape and Color managers.

  • API: These classes provides an Observer interface where external 'Providers' can listen for and then as necessary provide metrics information as requested.
  • Serialisation: This package allows metrics data to be provided and/or converted via a defined XML format.
  • Eclipse View: These classes provide a view that allows users to alter which metric visualizations are currently active and which displays are being used for each.

Existing Usage of OOD Features & Techniques

Areas of Greatest Concern

  • API: Is the architectural model appropriate? Is the use of the Observer pattern correct here?
  • Model: Are there any possible improvements?
  • String Manipulation: Is there any way to avoid the current String manipulation in Mapping Properties?
  • Display Strategies: Is there any way of simplifying this hierarchy? Are the current methods of instantiation appropriate?
  • Eclipse View: Dynamic updating of data is a concern here.
  • File Instances: Is the current design the most sound way of dealing with Eclipse's editor model (i.e. multiple files, with multiple views).
  • Alternative Languages: What can be done to make the system more modular and appropriate for multiple languages?

First Design