Talk:Behavioral completeness

From CSSEMediaWiki
Revision as of 21:39, 7 October 2008 by Elliot Fisher (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

I threw this together on a whim. I think I am on the right track here. I also found this paper, Pierik, which defines and compares Behavioural and Relative Completeness. Alas, I am not equipped with the skills to interpret their definition :( -TK 04:49, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Just a thought, but Strategy breaks this somewhat, no? --Kris 18:58, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Maybe by "Software object" they don't mean a single class, but the components that make up a representation of a real world object? In that case even though the Strategy pattern puts some behaviour into a separate class hierarchy, the behaviour is still contained within the "software object" via the composition relationship. --Elliot Fisher 21:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools