Talk:Don't burn your base class
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
I put up a link to the appropriate refactoring. Don't criticise me i might cry. -- [[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 05:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | I put up a link to the appropriate refactoring. Don't criticise me i might cry. -- [[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 05:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | LOL :) No, I think criticism is the basis behind the peer review process, and an important part of working within a [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_sphere public sphere]] --[[User:Tureiti Keith|TK]] 07:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 07:45, 5 October 2008
A quick google search revealed this definition in a conversation between Eric Gunnerson and Bruce Eckel. --TK 22:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
OK, my definition is a little thin on references. I have extrapolated this definition from the Eric Gunnerson and Bruce Eckel conversation metioned above. Perhaps not the most academically sound approach; as such, I am keen for any criticism. --TK 23:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
You want criticism, OK. You lack self-confidence.
I put up a link to the appropriate refactoring. Don't criticise me i might cry. -- Jason Clutterbuck 05:30, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
LOL :) No, I think criticism is the basis behind the peer review process, and an important part of working within a [public sphere] --TK 07:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
