Talk:Interpreter
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- [[User:JaninaVoigt|Janina Voigt]] | I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- [[User:JaninaVoigt|Janina Voigt]] | ||
| − | Agreed. It is very specific, maybe this was one of the areas they thought patterns applied most to and thus decided to add it. --[[User:AlexGee|AlexGee]] | + | :Agreed. It is very specific, maybe this was one of the areas they thought patterns applied most to and thus decided to add it. --[[User:AlexGee|AlexGee]] |
| + | |||
| + | :I agree, though having said that, the GoF never claimed all of there patterns were applicable across domains (horizontal). And interpreter could be used for parsing stuff in a whole heap of domains... --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 04:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 27 September 2009
I wonder why the GoF decided to include this pattern as a design pattern. It just seems like it is very specific to a particular domain so it seems more like an analysis pattern to me. Any ideas? -- Janina Voigt
- Agreed. It is very specific, maybe this was one of the areas they thought patterns applied most to and thus decided to add it. --AlexGee
- I agree, though having said that, the GoF never claimed all of there patterns were applicable across domains (horizontal). And interpreter could be used for parsing stuff in a whole heap of domains... --Matthew Harward 04:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
