Talk:Many to many association idiom
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if ''Transaction'' was renamed ''Rental''. --[[User:Warwick Irwin|Wal]] 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | :I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if ''Transaction'' was renamed ''Rental''. --[[User:Warwick Irwin|Wal]] 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I took [[User:Warwick Irwin|Wal's]] advice and changed the class diagram to make it more sensible and I now understand the whole thing better for the effort :) --[[User:Jason Clutterbuck|Jason Clutterbuck]] 03:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Added the brief note about how this idea is related to the [[Mediator]] pattern. --[[User:Elliot Fisher|Elliot Fisher]] 00:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:54, 17 September 2008
Started the page. Put up some pretty pictures. If they can be improved tell me i can edit them easily --Jason Clutterbuck 04:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
- I have a couple of suggestions for improvement: (1) The association class would normally have fields that reference Customer & Video objects, rather than int IDs (OO vs relational); (2) The idiom might be clearer if Transaction was renamed Rental. --Wal 23:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
I took Wal's advice and changed the class diagram to make it more sensible and I now understand the whole thing better for the effort :) --Jason Clutterbuck 03:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Added the brief note about how this idea is related to the Mediator pattern. --Elliot Fisher 00:54, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
