Talk:Video rental system
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sounds like fun lecture. I missed this lecture cause I thought I wont be taking this paper. But I am back now! Anyway, after I look at the latest design, isn't it better to have PhysicalHolding Class as an abstract class? To exist, a PhysicalHolding object has to be in a form of VCR or DVD or something else (BlueRay, etc) objects so PhysicalHolding itself is a concept, not a real object. Thus I think PhysicalHolding class should be shown as an abstract class. -- [[User:Johannes Pagwiwoko|Jojo]] 15:20, 18 July 2008 | Sounds like fun lecture. I missed this lecture cause I thought I wont be taking this paper. But I am back now! Anyway, after I look at the latest design, isn't it better to have PhysicalHolding Class as an abstract class? To exist, a PhysicalHolding object has to be in a form of VCR or DVD or something else (BlueRay, etc) objects so PhysicalHolding itself is a concept, not a real object. Thus I think PhysicalHolding class should be shown as an abstract class. -- [[User:Johannes Pagwiwoko|Jojo]] 15:20, 18 July 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | Agreed -- [[User:David Thomson|David Thomson]] 23:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:17, 20 July 2008
Made page. put up pics. --Jason Clutterbuck 05:18, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Sounds like fun lecture. I missed this lecture cause I thought I wont be taking this paper. But I am back now! Anyway, after I look at the latest design, isn't it better to have PhysicalHolding Class as an abstract class? To exist, a PhysicalHolding object has to be in a form of VCR or DVD or something else (BlueRay, etc) objects so PhysicalHolding itself is a concept, not a real object. Thus I think PhysicalHolding class should be shown as an abstract class. -- Jojo 15:20, 18 July 2008
Agreed -- David Thomson 23:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
