Talk:Design maxims
From CSSEMediaWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(New page: I propose that the page have all of the information on sets of maxims removed, apart from links to the existing (and more detailed) sub pages. Then, we can have an attempt to sort these ma...) |
(Opinions plz?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I propose that the page have all of the information on sets of maxims removed, apart from links to the existing (and more detailed) sub pages. Then, we can have an attempt to sort these maxims by category. Thoughts? I realise that this may be less than practical for exams, but a separate page with just a huge list of links (or an overarching category) could achieve this with little difficulty. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 15:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | I propose that the page have all of the information on sets of maxims removed, apart from links to the existing (and more detailed) sub pages. Then, we can have an attempt to sort these maxims by category. Thoughts? I realise that this may be less than practical for exams, but a separate page with just a huge list of links (or an overarching category) could achieve this with little difficulty. --[[User:Matthew Harward|Matthew Harward]] 15:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | If I have an idea for a new maxim should I add it or are we sticking to commonly accepted ones? | ||
Revision as of 05:51, 13 October 2009
I propose that the page have all of the information on sets of maxims removed, apart from links to the existing (and more detailed) sub pages. Then, we can have an attempt to sort these maxims by category. Thoughts? I realise that this may be less than practical for exams, but a separate page with just a huge list of links (or an overarching category) could achieve this with little difficulty. --Matthew Harward 15:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
If I have an idea for a new maxim should I add it or are we sticking to commonly accepted ones?
